Patton v. Toudouze
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50273 Conference Calendar
JOHN WESLEY PATTON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RONALD TOUDOUZE, Adult Probation Officer (Bexar County Probation),
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CV-754 - - - - - - - - - -
June 15, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John Wesley Patton, Texas prisoner # 751103, is BARRED from
proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation
Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because, on at least
three prior occasions while incarcerated, Patton has brought an
action in a court of the United States that was dismissed as
frivolous. See prior cases cited in Patton v. Jefferson
Correctional Center, 136 F.3d 458, 460-65 (5th Cir. 1998).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-50273 -2-
Accordingly, Patton’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he may
not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is
in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical
injury. See § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED.
Patton has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the
full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district
court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.
IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patton v. Toudouze (Patton v. Toudouze) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.