Patton v. State

673 So. 2d 530, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4570, 1996 WL 210833
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 1, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1382
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 530 (Patton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patton v. State, 673 So. 2d 530, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4570, 1996 WL 210833 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The oral pronouncement of seven years’ probation for a first-degree misdemeanor is an illegal sentence. However, the written judgment reflects a probationary sentence of one year, which is a legal sentence. Appellant clearly -undertook this appeal out of concern for the rule in Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). This rule is inapplicable where, as here, the oral sentence is illegal. We therefore disregard the illegal oral sentence on the first degree misdemean- or conviction, and affirm appellant’s sentence as reflected in the written judgment of guilt.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. State
991 So. 2d 982 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 530, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4570, 1996 WL 210833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patton-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.