Patton v. State

41 Ark. 486
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 Ark. 486 (Patton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patton v. State, 41 Ark. 486 (Ark. 1883).

Opinion

English, C. J.

Thomas J. Patton was indicted for a misdemeanor in the circuit court of Ouachita county. He filed a demurrer to the indictment which the court overruled and adjudged that he pay all costs in and about the d.emurrer expended.

He then pleaded not guilty, was tried and acquitted, and the final judgment was that he “be discharged and that ■Ouachita county pay all costs'herein expended.”

In taxing up the costs in the case, the clerk taxed defendant with costs on the demurrer to the indictment, $7,30, including a fee of $5 to the prosecuting attorney. Defendant filed a motion to retax the costs, which was overruled by the court, and he appealed.

It is submitted for appellant — first, that he should have been taxed with no costs; and second, that if taxable with the costs of the demurrer, there is no statute allowing the prosecuting attorney a fee of $5 on a judgment merely •overruling 'a demurrer to an indictment.

I. Ordinarily, the costs in a criminal case will abide and follow the final judgment. But, if in the course of the prosecution, the court has specially adjudged the cost of some particular matter against defendant, the general judgment for costs against the county on his acquittal will not. relieve him from such specially adjudged costs.

II. There is no statute allowing a prosecuting attorney a fee of $5 on a judgment overruling a demurrer in a criminal prosecution. In criminal prosecutions he is allowed no fees except on convictions. — Fees Act. thirteenth Dec.,, 1875, sec. 1.

He is allowed a fee of $5 “ for each judgment obtained on complaint, information, or otherwise in the name of the State or any county,” — lb. But this has no application to-a judgment merely overruling a demurrer to an indictment, in a criminal case.

Reversed and remanded to the court below with instructions to sustain the motion to retax the costs, by striking-from the costs taxed against appellant the fee of $5 to the prosecuting attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. State
21 S.W. 105 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 Ark. 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patton-v-state-ark-1883.