Patton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJanuary 24, 2024
Docket22-0286V
StatusPublished

This text of Patton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Patton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

************************* RANDY PATTON, * No. 22-286V * Petitioner, * * Special Master Christian J. Moran v. * * Filed: January 2, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *************************

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner; Alec Saxe, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On December 28, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Randy Patton on March 11, 2022. Petitioner alleged that the influenza vaccine he received on November 1, 2019, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused him to suffer from injuries including Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) and related sequalae. Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted in the website. Respondent denies that petitioner suffered from ITP, denies that the vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged injury or any other injury, and denies that petitioner’s current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

RANDY PATTON,

Petitioner, No. 22-286V Special Master Moran V. ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. Randy Patton ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the " Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on November I, 2019.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura ("ITP") and

related sequalae that were caused by the flu vaccine. Petitioner fu11her alleges that he suffered

the residual effects of the alleged injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on petitioner's behalf as a result of the alleged injury. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner suffered from ITP; denies that the vaccine caused

petitioner's alleged injury, or any other injury; and denies that petitioner's current condition is a

sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S .C. § 300aa-2 l (a)(l ), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys ' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and petitioner' s attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can

reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

2 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S .C. § 300aa-15(i), subject

to the availability of sufficient statutory funds .

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award

for attorney's fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursed expenses, the money provided

pursuant to this Stipulati on will be used so lely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a

strict construction of 42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Patton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patton-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.