Patton v. Pearson Church

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Patton v. Pearson Church

31 A. 1079, 168 Pa. 321, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 795

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 20, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 50·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The able argument of the learned gentleman who represents the appellants has not persuaded us that the interpretation of the will of Gaylord Church on the trial in the court below was erroneous. The reasons given in support of his ruling by the learned trial judge are so satisfactory to us that we affirm the judgment on the opinion filed on the disposition of the reserved question.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The able argument of the learned gentleman who represents the appellants has not persuaded us that the interpretation of the will of Gaylord Church on the trial in the court below was erroneous. The reasons given in support of his ruling by the learned trial judge are so satisfactory to us that we affirm the judgment on the opinion filed on the disposition of the reserved question.

The judgment is affirmed.

Patton v. Pearson Church, 31 A. 1079, 168 Pa. 321, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 795 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

31 A. 1079 (Patton v. Pearson Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related