Patton v. Patton
2 Pennyp. 394
Opinion
Ve concur fully in the opinion of the learned judge of the Court below, as expressed in his charge to the jury, that this was a personal contract, not binding on the executors of the husband.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patton v. Patton, 2 Pennyp. 394 (Pa. 1882).
2 Pennyp. 394 (Patton v. Patton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ervin Estate
243 A.2d 420 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Wolfsohn v. Solms
139 A.2d 523 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)