Patton v. Patton

2 Pennyp. 394
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 1, 1882·No. No. 275·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

Ve concur fully in the opinion of the learned judge of the Court below, as expressed in his charge to the jury, that this was a personal contract, not binding on the executors of the husband.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patton v. Patton, 2 Pennyp. 394 (Pa. 1882).

2 Pennyp. 394 (Patton v. Patton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ervin Estate
243 A.2d 420 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Wolfsohn v. Solms
139 A.2d 523 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)