Patton v. Meddick

139 So. 880, 104 Fla. 398
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patton v. Meddick. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Fla. 1073
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 4, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said decrees. The cause having been heretofore before this Court from an order and decree overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint, Patton v. Meddick, 97 Fla. 1073, 122 So. 710, and affirmed. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the decrees- of the Circuit Court be and they are hereby affirmed.

Terrell and Davis, J.J., and Johnson, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patton v. Meddick, 139 So. 880, 104 Fla. 398 (Fla. 1932).

139 So. 880 (Patton v. Meddick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patton v. Meddick
122 So. 710 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)