Patton v. Matusick, Spadafora & Verrastro

16 A.D.3d 1072, 792 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2890
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 2005·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J), entered February 6, 2004 in a legal malpractice action. The order granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment in part and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985 [1990]). Present — Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patton v. Matusick, Spadafora & Verrastro, 16 A.D.3d 1072, 792 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

16 A.D.3d 1072 (Patton v. Matusick, Spadafora & Verrastro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dawn K. v. Lisa R.
76 A.D.2d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Allen v. General Electric Co.
32 A.D.3d 1163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)