Patton v. Jones

3 Del. Cas. 11
CourtCourt of Chancery of Delaware
DecidedApril 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Del. Cas. 11 (Patton v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patton v. Jones, 3 Del. Cas. 11 (Del. Ct. App. 1822).

Opinion

And the Chancellor further declares that the legacy bequeathed to Benjamin Jackson, and to James Kennedy of the Iron Hill, to Isaac Hill of the same place, to William McCIement and to Catherine Price, respectively, are severally to be deducted from the personal estate of the said testator Morgan Jones, [18]*18before the same is divided into moieties, and that the said legacies should be retained by the surviving executor, James Patton, to be paid to the said legatees, which said legacies may be paid immediately though there are times limited in said will beyond which their payment cannot be postponed.3

And the Chancellor further declares that the proceeds of sale of the real estate directed by the said will to be sold (the plantation on which the testator lived excepted) are to be considered as personal estate, and may pass under the description of personal estate, and be applied to the payment of debts of the testator, and to the pecuniary and residuary legacies bequeathed in the will (except the legacies to be paid out of the proceeds of the sale of the dwelling plantation), such being the intention of the testator.4 He has directed the sale to be made by his executors as soon after his decease as may be thought by them advantageous for the benefit of his estate; he has directed that all his lawful and just debts should be paid out of his estate; he has bequeathed several legacies to be paid by his executor, and he has not specially bequeathed the money arising from such sale. Hence it is clearly to be inferred that he intended that this money should be taken as personal property, and be converted into a general personal fund to be applied by his «executors, in a due course of administration, according to his will. By directing the real estate to be sold as soon as the executors should judge such sale to be advantageous for the benefit of his estate, he had in view such an application of the money arising from the sale as would most effectually enable the executors to pay the creditors and legatees the debts and legacies charged on his estate, in a manner the most beneficial to them, and so as most speedily to effectuate the general intention of his will.

And the Chancellor further declares that the expenses which accrued in making the sale of the dwelling plantation of the testator, and the compensation to which the executor is entitled for his service therein are to be retained out of that sale, and are [19]*19not to be charged upon the general personal fund of the said estate; and that the balance of the proceeds of sale of said plantation, after deducting said expenses and compensation, is to be paid to the children of said Zachariah Jones, and to the children of said Sarah Mason, as is directed by the said last will.

And the Chancellor further declares that all the expenses: which accrued in the maintenance of the child with which the said Mary Jones was pregnant at the time of the testator’s death, in its illness and burial, are not to be paid out of the sale of the dwelling plantation of the testator, but are to be paid out of that part of the general personal fund, which was bequeathed to the said child, that is to say, from the two third parts of the said general personal fund, and that the said James Patton, executor of the last will of the said Mary Jones pay one fourth part of said expenses, and that the other three fourth parts of said expenses be paid out of the moiety bequeathed to Morgan Jones Thomas,. Samuel Mason, son of John, and the children of Zachariah Jones, in proportion to their respective parts or shares of said moiety.

And the Chancellor further declares that the said James'. Patton, executor of the last will and testament of the said Mary Jones, deceased, is entitled as such executor, to the services of Hannah the black, so as to complete the period of seven years, next after the decease of the said Morgan Jones. And that the said James Patton, executor as aforesaid, is entitled as such executor to the service of Samuel Stephenson until the said Samuel shall arrive to the age of 24 years. And that the said James Patton executor of the last will of the said Mary Jones, at the expiration of said term of seven years, will be liable and bound to pay out of the assets of said Mary Jones, to the said Hannah, $100, and two suits of good substantial wearing apparel; and that he the said James Patton, executor of the last will of said Morgan Jones will be liable and bound to pay to the said Samuel Stephenson, at the expiration of the term of service of him the said Samuel, out of the general personal fund of the estate of the said Morgan Jones, $150.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Chancellor, that the said James Patton, executor of the said last, will and testament of the said Morgan Jones, do pay out of the general personal fund of the estate of the said testator, including therein the goods and chattels, rights and credits which were of the said Morgan Jones, and the proceeds of sale of the real estate directed by the said will to be sold (the plantation on which the said testator lived excepted) all debts which were lawfully and. justly due from the said testator at the time of his death; that he [20]*20the said James Patton, executor as aforesaid of the said Mary Jones, retain out of the said general personal fund the $2000 bequeathed to the said Mary Jones, if the same have not already been received and retained by the said Mary in her lifetime; and" that he the said James Patton, executor of said last will of said Morgan Jones, pay or retain out of the said general personal fund the legacy of $400 bequeathed to the said Zachariah Jones; and the legacy of $100 bequeathed to Sarah, Eliza, and Zachariah respectively, children of Zachariah Jones, brother of the testator; and the legacy of $200 bequeathed to Hannah and Morgan respectively, other children of the said Zachariah; and the legacy of $125 bequeathed to Joanna, Sally, Morgan, John, and Arthur respectively, children of the said Sarah Mason, sister of the said testator; and to Benjamin Jackson, son of Elizabeth Jackson, late of Pencada Hundred, the sum of $1500 bequeathed to him, the said Benjamin; and that he pay to James Kennedy, aforesaid, the sum of $200; to Isaac Hill aforesaid, $100; to William McClement $50; to Catharine Price, $50; legacies bequeathed as aforesaid to the said James, Isaac, William, and Catharine, respectively; and that he the said James Patton retain out of the said general personal fund $150 to be paid to the said Samuel Stephenson at the expiration of the term of service of him the said Samuel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Del. Cas. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patton-v-jones-delch-1822.