Patton v. Janney

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Patton v. Janney

18 F. Cas. 1339, 2 D.C. 71, 2 Cranch 71

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedApril 15, 1813

StatusPublished

This text of 18 F. Cas. 1339 (Patton v. Janney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patton v. Janney, 18 F. Cas. 1339, 2 D.C. 71, 2 Cranch 71 (circtddc 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

And of that opinion was

the Court,

(ThRuston, J., absent.)

The jury found verdicts against the defendants in two of the cases, but wished to reconsider as to the other cases. Mr. Lee, for the defendants, proposed to examine the defendants, against whom the verdicts were found, as witnesses for the other defendants ; but the Court said it was not consistent with the practice of the Court: all the causes having been submitted to the jury at the same time.

Bills of exception were taken by the defendants’ counsel, but no writ of error was prosecuted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

And of that opinion was

the Court,

(ThRuston, J., absent.)

The jury found verdicts against the defendants in two of the cases, but wished to reconsider as to the other cases. Mr. Lee, for the defendants, proposed to examine the defendants, against whom the verdicts were found, as witnesses for the other defendants ; but the Court said it was not consistent with the practice of the Court: all the causes having been submitted to the jury at the same time.

Bills of exception were taken by the defendants’ counsel, but no writ of error was prosecuted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 F. Cas. 1339, 2 D.C. 71, 2 Cranch 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patton-v-janney-circtddc-1813.