Patton v. Bostwick

39 Mich. 218, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 270
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 1878·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Marston, J.

This was simply a claim for a certain amount of money claimed to be due and owing upon a written agreement entered into by Victor M. Bostwick. After his decease the claim was presented against his estate, for allowance by the commissioners and was disallowed. Instead of taking an appeal a bill in chancery was filed and a decree rendered in favor of complainant. The claim in any view of the case was a proper one to be presented against the estate, and it was one which the commissioners had full power and authority [219]*219to allow. 2 Comp. L., § 4431. If disallowed the only remedy which was left the claimant was by an appeal.

The decree must be reversed and the bill dismissed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patton v. Bostwick, 39 Mich. 218, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 270 (Mich. 1878).

39 Mich. 218 (Patton v. Bostwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodrich v. Hubbard's Estate
206 N.W. 480 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1925)
Patrick v. Howard
10 N.W. 71 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)