Pattmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pattmon v. State

196 So. 2d 447, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5025

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 17, 1967

DocketNo. 7421

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 447 (Pattmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pattmon v. State, 196 So. 2d 447, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5025 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by way of direct information with robbery on October 18, 1963, and again on October 21, 1963. At the arraignment, defendant while represented by counsel entered a plea of guilty’ and was subsequently sentenced. He then filed two motions to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, both of which were denied. Defendant then filed, in pro. per., his notice of appeal, and this court relinquished jurisdiction with directions to the trial court to determine solvency. This having been done, the trial judge found the defendant insolvent and appointed counsel to represent him in this .'appeal.

After a thorough examination of the record, the briefs and all papers filed in this cause, and no error having been made to appear, the trial court’s order denying relief is affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and LILES and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by way of direct information with robbery on October 18, 1963, and again on October 21, 1963. At the arraignment, defendant while represented by counsel entered a plea of guilty’ and was subsequently sentenced. He then filed two motions to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, both of which were denied. Defendant then filed, in pro. per., his notice of appeal, and this court relinquished jurisdiction with directions to the trial court to determine solvency. This having been done, the trial judge found the defendant insolvent and appointed counsel to represent him in this .'appeal.

After a thorough examination of the record, the briefs and all papers filed in this cause, and no error having been made to appear, the trial court’s order denying relief is affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and LILES and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 2d 447, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pattmon-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.