Home/Indiana Supreme Court/Pattison v. Wilson

Pattison v. Wilson

22 Ind. 358
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 22 Ind. 358 (Pattison v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pattison v. Wilson, 22 Ind. 358 (Ind. 1864).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an application by the appellant under section 356, p. 215, 2 G-. & EL, for a new trial within a year after judgment. The application is based on newly discovered evidence. The complaint for the new trial does not profess to contain all the evidence given on the former trial, not even all upon the points upon which the new trial is sought. A demurrer was, for this reason, properly sustained [359]*359to said complaint. Cox v. Hutchings, 21 Ind. p. 219; Glidewell v. Daggy, id. 95.

Clay fool, Clarice, McDonald $ JRoache, for the appellant. Hendricks § Hovd, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roush v. Layton
51 Ind. 106 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)
Sanders v. Loy
45 Ind. 229 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Bartholomew v. Loy
44 Ind. 393 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ind. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pattison-v-wilson-ind-1864.