Pattie Pearson v. Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; And Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00130-CV
Pattie Pearson, Appellant v.
Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; and Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC, Appellees
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-24-003327, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant’s brief was originally due March 19, 2026. She filed a non-compliant brief March 24, 2026. On May 29, 2026, this Court sent a notice to appellant informing her that neither the corrected brief nor a motion for extension of time had been filed and that failure to file a satisfactory response by June 8, 2026, could result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has filed no corrected brief, motion for extension of time, nor any response to the Court’s notice. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: July 16, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pattie Pearson v. Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; And Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC (Pattie Pearson v. Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; And Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.