Pattie Pearson v. Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; And Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)·Decided July 16, 2026·No. 03-26-00130-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00130-CV

Pattie Pearson, Appellant v.

Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; and Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC, Appellees

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-24-003327, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s brief was originally due March 19, 2026. She filed a non-compliant brief March 24, 2026. On May 29, 2026, this Court sent a notice to appellant informing her that neither the corrected brief nor a motion for extension of time had been filed and that failure to file a satisfactory response by June 8, 2026, could result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has filed no corrected brief, motion for extension of time, nor any response to the Court’s notice. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: July 16, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pattie Pearson v. Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; And Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Pattie Pearson v. Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; And Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC (Pattie Pearson v. Mercedes Benz of Austin, LLC; And Mercedes Benz, USA, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.