Patterson v. Towne Bank
This text of 437 F. App'x 258 (Patterson v. Towne Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaints without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Towne Bank, No. 2:10-cv-00437-RBS-FBS; Patterson v. Teide Enters., Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00434-RBS-FBS; and Patterson v. United States, No. 2:10— cv-00614-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2010; Nov. 5, 2010; and Jan. 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 F. App'x 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-towne-bank-ca4-2011.