Patterson v. Stoddard

47 Me. 355
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 47 Me. 355 (Patterson v. Stoddard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Stoddard, 47 Me. 355 (Me. 1860).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.

The defendant made a verbal contract with the plaintiff for the purchase of certain real estate, and, with his permission, went into the occupation thereof. Neither party was liable to the other for not performing his part of this contract.

After remaining in possession two years, the defendant voluntarily abandoned the premises; and the plaintiff has brought this action of assumpsit for the use and occupation thereof.

There was no agreement on the part of the defendant to pay rent. And if he had been ready to pay for the place, and the plaintiff had refused to convey it to him, he would not be liable for the use and occupation of it. But he sustained the relation to the plaintiff of tenant at will; and the plaintiff was ready to convey the premises to him, but he neglected to pay therefor. The occupation was beneficial to him; and, in order to do justice between the parties, the law will imply a promise on his part, when he took possession, in case he should fail to fulfil his part of the contract, to pay for the use of the premises. The defendant must therefore be defaulted, to be heard in damages.

Tenney, C. J., and Bice, Cutting, May, and Goodenow, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frost Vacationland Properties, Inc. v. Palmer
1999 ME 15 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1999)
Frost v. Barrett
246 A.2d 198 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1968)
Weeks v. Standish Hardware & Garage Co.
75 A.2d 444 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1950)
Banta v. Carroll W. Griffith Co.
171 A. 450 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1934)
Ruge v. Webb Press Co.
71 Fla. 536 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)
Mesa Market Co. v. Crosby
174 F. 96 (Eighth Circuit, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 Me. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-stoddard-me-1860.