Patterson v. Stewart

6 Watts & Serg. 527
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 15, 1843
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 Watts & Serg. 527 (Patterson v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Stewart, 6 Watts & Serg. 527 (Pa. 1843).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the principle of the District. Court right, and we adopt it. By the breach of a covenant against encumbrances, the purchase money becomes instantly revendicable, with interest, except for any time during which the purchaser may have been in the perception of profits, actual or potential, which could not be recovered from him. In this instance, though the covenant was broken at the sealing of the deed, the conveyance nevertheless vested the exclusive ownership in the purchaser till it was divested by the sale on the encumbrance, and to the profits, in the mean time, the incumbrancer could make no pretension. But as the purchaser’s possession had been legal and not actual, it was extinguished by the sheriff’s conveyance along with his seisin, of which it was an incident. From that time the use of the purchase money in the hands of the vendor was without an equivalent ; and the original vendee became entitled to interest for it in the shape of damages.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. Bridgford
27 S.W. 69 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1894)
Ankeny v. Clark
148 U.S. 345 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Tyson v. Eyrick
21 A. 635 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)
Terry's v. Drabenstadt
68 Pa. 400 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Watts & Serg. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-stewart-pa-1843.