Patterson v. State

287 S.W.2d 949
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patterson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 164 Tex. Crim. 121
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 14, 1956·No. No. 28167·Published

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $200.

The complaint appears to be sufficient but the information upon which appellant was convicted is fatally defective in that it fails to designate or name appellant or any other person as having committed the offense, nor does it allege that the name of the accused is unknown.

Art. 414 Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. (4) requires that an information “contain the name of the accused, or state that his name is unknown and give a reasonably accurate description of him.”

There being a valid complaint upon which a new information naming the accused may be presented, the prosecution will not be dismissed. See Simmons v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 14, 252 S.W.2d 711.

Because of the insufficiency of the information, the judgment is reversed and. the cause is remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. State, 287 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. 1956).

287 S.W.2d 949 (Patterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. State
252 S.W.2d 711 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1952)