Patterson v. State
This text of 88 S.W. 226 (Patterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of obstructing a public road, and appeals. He filed a motion to quash the complaint and information. The court did not err in overruling this motion, as the complaint and information are in proper form.
The record is rather voluminous, but the statement of facts cannot be considered as it was filed after the adjournment of the term and there-is no order allowing such filing. The term adjourned on August 11, 1904, and the statement of facts was filed on August 20, 1904. In the absence of the facts .this court cannot review the various requested charges and bills of exception and determine whether or not any injury was done to appellant.
Ho reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 S.W. 226, 48 Tex. Crim. 322, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-state-texcrimapp-1905.