Patterson v. State
This text of 171 S.E. 726 (Patterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Tlie three excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of in the motion for new trial, when considered in the light of the remainder of the charge and the facts of the case, show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.
2. The requested charge was sufficiently covered by the charge given, and the refusal of it was not error.
3. The verdict was amply authorized, if not demanded, by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 S.E. 726, 47 Ga. App. 844, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-state-gactapp-1933.