Patterson v. State
This text of 126 S.E. 859 (Patterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being evidence tending to show that the accused and another were in possession of a whisky still which had recently been in operation, and of a barrel of mash which was itself intoxicating and ready for distillation, and that they were caught in the act of mixing the ingredients for making another barrel of mash, whereupon the accused stated that he was only hired by others to make such liquors and was making the same for them, the verdict finding him guilty of manufacturing intoxicating liquor was not without evidence to support it. Jenkins v. State, 24 Ga. App. 338 (100 S. E. 763); Belcher v. State, 25 Ga. App. 493 (103 S. E. 852). No other question is presented for decision.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 S.E. 859, 33 Ga. App. 570, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-state-gactapp-1925.