Patterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Patterson v. State

668 So. 2d 336, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1559, 1996 WL 72329

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1996

DocketNo. 95-991

StatusPublished

This text of 668 So. 2d 336 (Patterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. State, 668 So. 2d 336, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1559, 1996 WL 72329 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse because the trial court failed to credit the appellant for time served to which he is entitled pursuant to Section 921.161, Florida Statutes (1993). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to correct the appellant’s sentence to reflect an additional thirty-three days for time served in jail. See Kio v. State, 624 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So.2d 627 (Fla.1994).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse because the trial court failed to credit the appellant for time served to which he is entitled pursuant to Section 921.161, Florida Statutes (1993). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to correct the appellant’s sentence to reflect an additional thirty-three days for time served in jail. See Kio v. State, 624 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So.2d 627 (Fla.1994).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

668 So. 2d 336, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1559, 1996 WL 72329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack