Patterson v. State

520 So. 2d 703, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 554, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 718, 1988 WL 15494
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 1988·No. No. 85-906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We previously affirmed. See Patterson v. State, 486 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Subsequently, the Supreme Court of Florida, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, disapproved our decision and remanded to us for further consideration consistent with its opinion. See Patterson v. State, 513 So.2d 1263 (Fla.1987).

We have considered the matter, reverse the appellant’s sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing within the recommended range of the guidelines as they existed at the time of the offense. See Williams v. State, 492 So.2d 1308 (Fla.1986) (trial court directed to resentence within the recommended range of the guidelines where reasons advanced for departure failed to justify it); Carter v. State, 485 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. State, 520 So. 2d 703, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 554, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 718, 1988 WL 15494 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

520 So. 2d 703 (Patterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
492 So. 2d 1308 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Carter v. State
485 So. 2d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Patterson v. State
513 So. 2d 1263 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Patterson v. State
486 So. 2d 74 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)