Patterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Patterson v. State

342 So. 2d 515, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16168

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1976

DocketNo. AA-185

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 So. 2d 515 (Patterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. State, 342 So. 2d 515, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16168 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Although the defendant assigned as error the denial of his motion for a directed judgment of acquittal, he did not argue this assignment in his brief, therefore, abandoned it. We, therefore, have not considered the issue raised by this motion.

MILLS, Acting C. J., McCORD, J., and DRURY, ARVEL, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Although the defendant assigned as error the denial of his motion for a directed judgment of acquittal, he did not argue this assignment in his brief, therefore, abandoned it. We, therefore, have not considered the issue raised by this motion.

MILLS, Acting C. J., McCORD, J., and DRURY, ARVEL, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 So. 2d 515, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack