Patterson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Patterson v. State

81 So. 2d 349, 262 Ala. 684, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 541

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 16, 1955

Docket3 Div. 731

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 81 So. 2d 349 (Patterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. State, 81 So. 2d 349, 262 Ala. 684, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 541 (Ala. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

STAKELY, Justice.

In denying certiorari we do not mean to approve the statement in substance that the admissibility of book accounts in evidence is governed by § 414, Title 7, Code of 1940. Our view is that § 415, Title 7, Code of 1940, must also be considered. Section 415 was put in the code because § 414 was considered inadequate to the needs of present day business. Mitchell v. City of Mobile, 244 Ala. 442, 13 So.2d 664.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STAKELY, Justice.

In denying certiorari we do not mean to approve the statement in substance that the admissibility of book accounts in evidence is governed by § 414, Title 7, Code of 1940. Our view is that § 415, Title 7, Code of 1940, must also be considered. Section 415 was put in the code because § 414 was considered inadequate to the needs of present day business. Mitchell v. City of Mobile, 244 Ala. 442, 13 So.2d 664.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 So. 2d 349, 262 Ala. 684, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-state-ala-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack