Patterson v. State

81 So. 2d 349, 262 Ala. 684, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 541
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 16, 1955·No. 3 Div. 731·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

STAKELY, Justice.

In denying certiorari we do not mean to approve the statement in substance that the admissibility of book accounts in evidence is governed by § 414, Title 7, Code of 1940. Our view is that § 415, Title 7, Code of 1940, must also be considered. Section 415 was put in the code because § 414 was considered inadequate to the needs of present day business. Mitchell v. City of Mobile, 244 Ala. 442, 13 So.2d 664.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. State, 81 So. 2d 349, 262 Ala. 684, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 541 (Ala. 1955).

81 So. 2d 349 (Patterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saranthus v. State
501 So. 2d 1247 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Neal v. State
372 So. 2d 1331 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1979)
Pierce v. State
151 So. 2d 793 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1963)