Patterson v. State
36 Ala. 297
Opinion
It is clear that, under section 1058 of the Code, neither the fact that the liquor was drunk in the State of Tennessee, nor that the drinking took place on lands over which the defendant had no control, would, as matter of law, require the acquittal of the accused. See Easterling v. The State, 30 Ala. 46; Downman v. The State, 14 Ala. 243; Brown v. The State, 31 Ala. 353.
Judgment of the circuit court affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patterson v. State, 36 Ala. 297 (Ala. 1860).
36 Ala. 297 (Patterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. State
96 Ala. 56 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Whaley v. State
87 Ala. 83 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)