Patterson v. Smith

179 S.E.2d 247, 227 Ga. 170, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 628
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1971·No. 26193·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

The petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in which he asserted that two sentences imposed by the Superior Court of Gwinnett County were illegally imposed upon him. The trial court remanded the petitioner to custody and he filed the present appeal. Held:

1. "The legality of the present confinement is the question under review in a habeas corpus proceeding. See Harris v. Norris, 188 Ga. 610, 611 (4 SE2d 840); Dutton v. Knight, 223 Ga. 140 (153 SE2d 714).” Evans v. Perkins, 225 Ga. 48, 50 (165 SE2d 652).

2. The sentences attacked were by their express terms to be served consecutively to the sentences the prisoner was then serving, as provided for by the Act of 1964 (Ga. L. 1964, p. 494; Code Ann. § 27-2510). Under the undisputed evidence adduced at the hearing the petitioner’s present confinement is not under the sentences attacked, but under prior sentences,.and the trial court did not err in remanding the petitioner to the custody of the warden of the State prison.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. Smith, 179 S.E.2d 247, 227 Ga. 170, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 628 (Ga. 1971).

179 S.E.2d 247 (Patterson v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Creamer v. State
192 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Henderson
255 So. 2d 85 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)
Patterson v. State
185 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)