Patterson v. Scranton etc. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Patterson v. Scranton etc. R.

18 A. 563, 129 Pa. 109, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 933

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 4, 1889

DocketNo. 48

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A. 563 (Patterson v. Scranton etc. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. Scranton etc. R., 18 A. 563, 129 Pa. 109, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 933 (Pa. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam :

The sole complaint in this case is that the court erred in not continuing the preliminary injunction.

We are of opinion that there is no error in the decree complained of. Adhering to our general rule in cases of this class, we intimate no opinion on the merits of the case in other respects. The proper time to do that is when the case comes here, if it ever does, on appeal from a final decree of the court below.

Decree affirmed at the costs of appellant and record remitted for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam :

The sole complaint in this case is that the court erred in not continuing the preliminary injunction.

We are of opinion that there is no error in the decree complained of. Adhering to our general rule in cases of this class, we intimate no opinion on the merits of the case in other respects. The proper time to do that is when the case comes here, if it ever does, on appeal from a final decree of the court below.

Decree affirmed at the costs of appellant and record remitted for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A. 563, 129 Pa. 109, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-scranton-etc-r-pa-1889.