Patterson v. Saul

W.D. North Carolina

Patterson v. Saul

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina

DecidedMay 18, 2022

Docket5:20-cv-00117

StatusUnknown

This text of Patterson v. Saul (Patterson v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. Saul, (W.D.N.C. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION JONATHAN PATTERSON, ) Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 5:20-CV-00117-GCM KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s Order remanding this case to the district court and the parties’ joint motion for remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 8§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). For good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 8§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 US. 89 (1991). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.

Signed: May 18, 2022 Salon Lala Graham C. Mullen ee United States District Judge ee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION JONATHAN PATTERSON, ) Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 5:20-CV-00117-GCM KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s Order remanding this case to the district court and the parties’ joint motion for remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 8§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). For good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 8§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 US. 89 (1991). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.

Signed: May 18, 2022 Salon Lala Graham C. Mullen ee United States District Judge ee

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Patterson v. Saul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-saul-ncwd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack