Patterson v. Richstad

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1350

PATRICIA T. PATTERSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KENNETH A. RICHSTAD, Clerk of Court,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:09-cv-02051-MBS)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

Patterson v. Richstad, No. 0:09-cv-02051-MBS (D.S.C. filed

Mar. 5; entered Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED