Patterson v. Patterson

606 So. 2d 767, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11243, 1992 WL 308846
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2806
StatusPublished

This text of 606 So. 2d 767 (Patterson v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Patterson, 606 So. 2d 767, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11243, 1992 WL 308846 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects, except we reverse the trial court’s equitable distribution of the husband’s pension plan. The trial court erred in concluding that the husband’s entire pension plan was marital property since the husband established his pension plan five years before the parties married. Accordingly, the trial court must recalculate the portion of the pension plan properly deemed to be marital property. Griffiths v. Griffiths, 563 So.2d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffiths v. Griffiths
563 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
606 So. 2d 767, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11243, 1992 WL 308846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-patterson-fladistctapp-1992.