Patterson v. Patterson
This text of 606 So. 2d 767 (Patterson v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm in all respects, except we reverse the trial court’s equitable distribution of the husband’s pension plan. The trial court erred in concluding that the husband’s entire pension plan was marital property since the husband established his pension plan five years before the parties married. Accordingly, the trial court must recalculate the portion of the pension plan properly deemed to be marital property. Griffiths v. Griffiths, 563 So.2d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
606 So. 2d 767, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11243, 1992 WL 308846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-patterson-fladistctapp-1992.