Patterson v. Office of Compliance
This text of Patterson v. Office of Compliance (Patterson v. Office of Compliance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
STEVEN PATTERSON, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent. ____________________
2009-6002 ______________________
On petition for review of a decision of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance in No. 07-AC-31. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JEFFREY H. LEIB, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
WILLIAM WACHTER, Attorney, Office of Compliance, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief was PETER A. EVELETH, General Counsel. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (GAJARSA, MAYER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 14, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Patterson v. Office of Compliance, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-office-of-compliance-cafc-2010.