Patterson v. Nickerson
This text of Patterson v. Nickerson (Patterson v. Nickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6396
EUGENE P. PATTERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NICKERSON; DICK CHASSE; JOSEPH S. BROOKS; R. M. WHITE; HARRELL WATTS; TOM BURKETT; RICHARD L. KEISTER; SUSAN GOLDY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-583-2)
Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 4, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene P. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Eugene P. Patterson seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Patterson seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Patterson v. Nickerson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-nickerson-ca4-2004.