Patterson v. Longview Gin Co.
This text of 104 So. 871 (Patterson v. Longview Gin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was tried in the court below without a jury. A discussion of the evidence and inferences to be drawn therefrom would serve no useful purpose. It is sufficient to say that the conclusion of the trial jpdge finds support in the record, and in our opinion is not contrary to the great weight of the evidence, and is not plainly erroneous-or manifestly wrong. Such being the case, the finding of the trial court has the effect of a verdict of a jury. Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341.
The judgment appealed from is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 So. 871, 21 Ala. App. 26, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-longview-gin-co-alactapp-1925.