Patterson v. Lane

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Patterson v. Lane

35 Pa. 275

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 1, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 Pa. 275 (Patterson v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. Lane, 35 Pa. 275 (Pa. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Read, J.

W e are of opinion that the plaintiffs in this bill have an adequate and complete remedy at law, specially provided by the act to encourage manufacturing operations in this Commonwealth, passed 7th April 1849. The mode of making individual stockholders liable is particularly prescribed by this act, and must be through the medium of an action at law, judgment, and execution in the manner therein, pointed out. The plaintiffs must, [276]*276therefore, resort ito their common law suit under the Act of Assembly.

B'ecree affirmed at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Read, J.

W e are of opinion that the plaintiffs in this bill have an adequate and complete remedy at law, specially provided by the act to encourage manufacturing operations in this Commonwealth, passed 7th April 1849. The mode of making individual stockholders liable is particularly prescribed by this act, and must be through the medium of an action at law, judgment, and execution in the manner therein, pointed out. The plaintiffs must, [276]*276therefore, resort ito their common law suit under the Act of Assembly.

B'ecree affirmed at the costs of the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Pa. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-lane-pa-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack