Patterson v. Konteh, Unpublished Decision (8-8-2002)

CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 8, 2002
DocketCourt of Appeals No. L-02-1213.
StatusUnpublished

This text of Patterson v. Konteh, Unpublished Decision (8-8-2002) (Patterson v. Konteh, Unpublished Decision (8-8-2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Konteh, Unpublished Decision (8-8-2002), (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
This original action is before the court upon the petition of Samuel Patterson for a writ of habeas corpus. We hereby order the petition dismissed because Patterson did not comply with the requirement of R.C.2725.04(D) that he attach to his petition his pertinent commitment papers. Johnson v. Mitchell (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 123 and Boyd v. Money (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 388, 389.

This original action is hereby ordered dismissed at petitioner's costs.

PETITION DISMISSED.

Peter M. Handwork, J., Melvin L. Resnick, J., and James R. Sherck, J., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyd v. Money
696 N.E.2d 568 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Johnson v. Mitchell
707 N.E.2d 471 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Patterson v. Konteh, Unpublished Decision (8-8-2002), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-konteh-unpublished-decision-8-8-2002-ohioctapp-2002.