Patterson v. Kaine

Fourth Circuit

Patterson v. Kaine

437 F. App'x 236

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 5, 2011·No. No. 10-7703·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry E. Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief judgment, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Patterson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Patterson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry E. Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief judgment, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Patterson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Patterson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Patterson v. Kaine, 437 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

437 F. App'x 236 (Patterson v. Kaine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.