Patterson v. Hynes

Michigan Supreme Court

Patterson v. Hynes

112 N.W. 129, 148 Mich. 581, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 592

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 14, 1907

DocketCalendar No. 22,303

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 112 N.W. 129 (Patterson v. Hynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. Hynes, 112 N.W. 129, 148 Mich. 581, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 592 (Mich. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause was heard in the circuit [582]*582court in chancery on pleadings and proofs taken in open court; decree being rendered in favor of defendant on February 24, 1906. A claim of appeal was filed with the register,in chancery on March 26, 1906, and on March 29, 1906, a bond on appeal was filed, and the surety was approved by the circuit judge under Act No. 248 of the Public Acts of 1899. Time to settle the case was extended until March 15, 1907, when the case was settled and filed, and the files were forwarded to this court by the register. Counsel for defendant now move to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that no claim of appeal, as required by Act No. 243 of the Public Acts of 1899, was made and filed with the register within 40 days from the settlement of the case on appeal.

A claim of appeal having been made before settlement of a case, it was not fatal that another claim was not filed later, when no harm has resulted. Simons v. Simons, 47 Mich. 645; Love v. Francis, 63 Mich. 181; Sherman v. Sherman, 139 Mich. 180.

The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause was heard in the circuit [582]*582court in chancery on pleadings and proofs taken in open court; decree being rendered in favor of defendant on February 24, 1906. A claim of appeal was filed with the register,in chancery on March 26, 1906, and on March 29, 1906, a bond on appeal was filed, and the surety was approved by the circuit judge under Act No. 248 of the Public Acts of 1899. Time to settle the case was extended until March 15, 1907, when the case was settled and filed, and the files were forwarded to this court by the register. Counsel for defendant now move to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that no claim of appeal, as required by Act No. 243 of the Public Acts of 1899, was made and filed with the register within 40 days from the settlement of the case on appeal.

A claim of appeal having been made before settlement of a case, it was not fatal that another claim was not filed later, when no harm has resulted. Simons v. Simons, 47 Mich. 645; Love v. Francis, 63 Mich. 181; Sherman v. Sherman, 139 Mich. 180.

The motion is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 N.W. 129, 148 Mich. 581, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-hynes-mich-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack