Patterson v. Harbin
This text of 34 S.E.2d 557 (Patterson v. Harbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the absence oí exceptions pendente lite duly certified and filed, and appeal to the appellate division of the civil court of Pulton County may not complain of rulings of the trial judge occurring more than 15 (formerly. 10) days prior to the making of the appeal; and an appeal from an order of the trial judge overruling an oral motion for new trial which does not set forth the grounds of the oral motion is incomplete, and presents nothing for consideration by the appellate division.; and there was no error in dismissing the appeal. Columbia Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. Roberts, 44 Ga. App. 314 (161 S. E. 291); Ga. L. 1933, p. 293.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.E.2d 557, 72 Ga. App. 549, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-harbin-gactapp-1945.