Patterson v. Grand Lodge K. of P.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Patterson v. Grand Lodge K. of P.

50 So. 377, 162 Ala. 430, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 425

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 30, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 So. 377 (Patterson v. Grand Lodge K. of P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. Grand Lodge K. of P., 50 So. 377, 162 Ala. 430, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 425 (Ala. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.

Counts 1 and 2 are bad, and were subject to tbe demurrers interposed thereto.

Counts 3, 4, 5, and 6 were not subject to the demurrers, which should have been overruled. Form 12, p. 1196, of the Code of 1907. Nor can we say that amended count 6, the one upon which the case was tried, covered the other counts, or that it affirmatively appears beyond dispute that the policy described iu said sixth count was the only one ever issued to Daniel Patterson.

The judgment of the city court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Dowdell, C. J., and Simpson and Mayeield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI