Patterson v. Gladhill

Fourth Circuit

Patterson v. Gladhill

616 F. App'x 62

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2015·No. No. 15-6552·Published

Opinion

[63] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Broderick Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Gladhill, No. 8:14-cv-00026-DKC, 2015 WL 1186575 (D.Md. Mar. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[63] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Broderick Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Gladhill, No. 8:14-cv-00026-DKC, 2015 WL 1186575 (D.Md. Mar. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Patterson v. Gladhill, 616 F. App'x 62 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

616 F. App'x 62 (Patterson v. Gladhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related