Patterson v. Fidelity

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 3, 2016·No. 187 WAL 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

CYNTHIA A. PATTERSON, ROBERT C. : No. 187 WAL 2016 SWARTZWELDER AND LYNNE A. : SWARTZWELDER, : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Respondents : the Order of the Superior Court : : v. : : : FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE : COMPANY, AND FIDELITY NATIONAL : TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW : YORK, : : Petitioners : : : SHARIEE L. DECOOMAN, : : Respondent : : : v. : : : LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE : CORPORATION, : : Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2016, the Application to File a Supplemental

Petition is DENIED. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. Fidelity, (Pa. 2016).

Patterson v. Fidelity (Patterson v. Fidelity) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.