Patterson v. Fidelity & Lawyers, Pets
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
CYNTHIA A. PATTERSON, ROBERT C. : SWARTZWELDER AND LYNNE A. : No. 51 WM 2019 SWARTZWELDER, :
:
Respondents :
:
v. :
:
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE : COMPANY AND FIDELITY NATIONAL : TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW : YORK, :
:
Petitioner :
________________________________ : SHARIEE L. DECOOMAN, :
:
Respondent :
:
v. :
:
LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE : CORPORATION, :
Petitioner
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal,
treated as a Petition for Review, is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patterson v. Fidelity & Lawyers, Pets (Patterson v. Fidelity & Lawyers, Pets) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.