Patterson v. Fidelity & Lawyers, Pets
This text of Patterson v. Fidelity & Lawyers, Pets (Patterson v. Fidelity & Lawyers, Pets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
CYNTHIA A. PATTERSON, ROBERT C. : SWARTZWELDER AND LYNNE A. : No. 51 WM 2019 SWARTZWELDER, : : Respondents : : v. : : FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE : COMPANY AND FIDELITY NATIONAL : TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW : YORK, : : Petitioner : ________________________________ : SHARIEE L. DECOOMAN, : : Respondent : : v. : : LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE : CORPORATION, :
Petitioner
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal,
treated as a Petition for Review, is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Patterson v. Fidelity & Lawyers, Pets, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-fidelity-lawyers-pets-pa-2019.