Patterson v. Farish & Sons

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Patterson v. Farish & Sons

131 S.E. 186, 34 Ga. App. 785, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 35

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 13, 1926

Docket16921

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 131 S.E. 186 (Patterson v. Farish & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. Farish & Sons, 131 S.E. 186, 34 Ga. App. 785, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 35 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains of the admission of certain documentary evidence, but, as the evidence is not set forth in the ground nor attached thereto as an exhibit, this ground can not be considered. Carson v. State, 23 Ga. App. 535 (3) (98 S. E. 187).

2. There is np merit in the other special ground of the motion.

3. The evidence demanded a verdict for the defendant, and the court did not err in directing such a verdict, nor in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI