Patterson v. Epperson's Admr.

3 Ky. Op. 562, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 199
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 4, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ky. Op. 562 (Patterson v. Epperson's Admr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Epperson's Admr., 3 Ky. Op. 562, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 199 (Ky. Ct. App. 1870).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

The demand of the account of appellant against decedent Epperson from from his administrator, with the proper affidavits, sufficiently appears. But if it did not it is to late after answer and issue and jury sworn, to have the suit dismissed upon rule though it was sued out and response thereto before the jury were sworn.

The failure to have the rule disposed of before issue on the merits and jury, must be regarded as a waiver of the rule.

Having dismissed the plaintiff’s petition, which confessed the note and account set up in the cross action as a set-off against the plaintiff’s claim, he should then have been allowed to answer [563]*563the cross suit and set up his account as a defense to such cross action.

Garnett, James, for appellant. Winfrey, for appellee.

For these errors the judgment is reversed with directions to proceed to trial on the merits, as herein indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ky. Op. 562, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-eppersons-admr-kyctapp-1870.