PATTERSON v. CROTHERS

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Jersey
DecidedJune 4, 2025
Docket3:25-cv-02599
StatusUnknown

This text of PATTERSON v. CROTHERS (PATTERSON v. CROTHERS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PATTERSON v. CROTHERS, (D.N.J. 2025).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

TERRANCE PATTERSON,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 25-2599 (GC)

JEFFREY CROTHERS, et al. MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Respondents.

CASTNER, District Judge

Petitioner is a state prisoner currently incarcerated at New Jersey State Prison, Trenton, New Jersey. He is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”). (ECF No. 1 (“Petition”).) Petitioner did not submit the five-dollar filing fee for a habeas petition, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), or apply to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). IT IS, therefore, on this day 4th of June, 2025, ORDERED as follows: ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case, without filing the Petition; Petitioner is informed that administrative termination is not a “dismissal” for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Papotto v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 731 F.3d 265, 275 (3d Cir. 2013) (distinguishing administrative terminations from dismissals); Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands, 705 F.3d 80, 84 n.2 (3d Cir. 2013) (describing prisoner mailbox rule generally); Dasilva v. Sheriff’s Dep’t., 413 F. App’x 498, 502 (3rd Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (“[The] statute of limitations is met when a [motion] is submitted to the clerk before the statute runs... .”); and it is further ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in a writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse, 402 East State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Memorandum and Order; Petitioner’s writing shall include either (1) a complete IFP application or (11) the five-dollar filing fee; and it is further ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Petitioner stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete IFP application or payment of the filing fee within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order and a blank form DNJ-Pro Se-007-B-(Rev. 09/09) upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail.

Goagtts Clann GEORGETTE CASTNER United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DaSilva v. Sheriff's Department
413 F. App'x 498 (Third Circuit, 2011)
Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel Highland
705 F.3d 80 (Third Circuit, 2013)
Lisa Papotto v. Hartford Life & Accident Insur
731 F.3d 265 (Third Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PATTERSON v. CROTHERS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-crothers-njd-2025.