Patterson v. Commonwealth
This text of 74 F.3d 1233 (Patterson v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nathaniel PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Virginia Department of
Corrections; Red, White and Blue Label's Wheel of Fortune
Television Broadcasting Company; Red, White and Blue
Sweepstakes; Wheel of Fortune, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7405.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 12, 1995.
Decided: January 11, 1996.
Nathaniel Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Patterson v. Virginia, No. CA-95-750-AM (E.D.Va. July 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-commonwealth-ca4-1996.