Patterson v. City Trust Safe Deposit & Surety Co.
This text of 27 Misc. 835 (Patterson v. City Trust Safe Deposit & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was clearly a casé to submit to the jury upon which théy alone, from the evidence, presented, could determine. . We are satisfied that the 'whole case was fairly submitted and that the jury properly found for the defendant.
Unless it appears that the jury in arriving at their determination did so under prejudice, passion, or malice, their verdict will [836]*836not be disturbed, and particularly so where the case points that it is one clearly for their determination.
" This case was one and we find no error, and, therefore, affirm the judgment, with costs;
Scotchman, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Misc. 835, 58 N.Y.S. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-city-trust-safe-deposit-surety-co-nynyccityct-1899.