Patterson v. City of New York
This text of 163 A.D. 914 (Patterson v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as to the appellant the City of Hew York. Ho opinion. Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event as to the appellant the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, upon the ground that, in the absence of evidence by plaintiff that the ear could have been stopped after the motorman had notice of the impending danger, no question of fact was raised which justified the court in submitting the question of said appellant’s negligence to the jury. (Albrecht v. Rochester, Syracuse & E. R. R. Co., 205 N. Y. 230.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ'., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A.D. 914, 147 N.Y.S. 1130, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1914.