Patterson v. City of Chesapeake

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2009
Docket08-1796
StatusUnpublished

This text of Patterson v. City of Chesapeake (Patterson v. City of Chesapeake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1796

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-1928

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; STUART GORDON; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; CITY OF NORFOLK,

Defendants.

No. 08-2268

JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

2 Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Hanson Lindley, Grady A. Palmer, CHESAPEAKE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Chesapeake, Virginia, Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, Marshall Allen Winslow, Jr., WOLCOTT, RIVERS & GATES, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Sara Ashley John, M. RICHARD EPPS, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Robert Henry Burger, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Andrew Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, Joseph Franklin Verser, JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

3 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr.,

seeks to appeal the district court’s orders cumulatively

dismissing all defendants from this civil action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS (E.D.

Va. June 20, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008; filed Sept. 30 & entered

Oct. 2, 2008). We further grant Patterson’s motion to proceed

on appeal in forma pauperis, but deny his motion to admit new

evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-city-of-chesapeake-ca4-2009.