Patterson v. City of Chesapeake
This text of Patterson v. City of Chesapeake (Patterson v. City of Chesapeake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1796
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-1928
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; STUART GORDON; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants – Appellees,
and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; CITY OF NORFOLK,
Defendants.
No. 08-2268
JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2 Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Hanson Lindley, Grady A. Palmer, CHESAPEAKE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Chesapeake, Virginia, Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, Marshall Allen Winslow, Jr., WOLCOTT, RIVERS & GATES, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Sara Ashley John, M. RICHARD EPPS, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Robert Henry Burger, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Andrew Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, Joseph Franklin Verser, JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3 PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr.,
seeks to appeal the district court’s orders cumulatively
dismissing all defendants from this civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS (E.D.
Va. June 20, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008; filed Sept. 30 & entered
Oct. 2, 2008). We further grant Patterson’s motion to proceed
on appeal in forma pauperis, but deny his motion to admit new
evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-city-of-chesapeake-ca4-2009.